Care crisis hits the NHS as delayed discharges reach record high of 1.8 MILLION days

  • Patients left lying in hospital because of lack of adult care services
  • Total number of delayed discharges up 30 percent since 2011/12
  • Government attempts to alleviate the adult care crisis having no effect

By Chaminda Jayanetti

The number of delayed discharges in the NHS and adult care system reached record highs in 2015/16 amid the ongoing social care crisis, according to official figures published yesterday.

The number of patients whose discharge from hospitals and other health facilities was delayed for non-clinical reasons rose by nearly 10 percent in 2015/16, to more than 60,000 – a rise of nearly 30 percent since 2011/12, the first full year in which the data was measured.

The total length of delayed discharges reached more than 1.8 million days, up nearly a third since 2011/12. This suggests that each delay lasts a month on average.

Delayed discharges are officially called Delayed Transfers of Care, and are sometimes dubbed “bed blocking” as they mean hospital beds cannot be cleared for new patients, although this term is now seen as pejorative.

They are regarded as a result of the crisis in adult care, where a combination of fragmented, marketised services, government funding cuts and a growing elderly population means there are not enough care services for people to access when their hospital treatment is complete.

As a result, they have to be kept in hospital even after their treatment is over, putting pressure on NHS resources.

Most of the delayed discharges are from NHS acute hospitals, which have risen by almost 50 percent since 2011/12. However, the largest one-year  rise was in delayed discharges from non-acute settings, including mental health and community health facilities.


The three biggest causes of delayed discharges are people awaiting completion of an assessment, people waiting for further non-acute NHS care, and people waiting for an adult care package to be prepared for their own home to allow them to live independently. These three factors together caused more than half of the 63,167 delayed discharges in 2015/16.

Councils are increasingly trying to get frail and disabled people to live in their own homes for longer to reduce demand for costly residential care homes – but it seems these same cash-strapped councils are struggling to keep up with demand, with the number of delayed discharges caused by people awaiting a care package in their own home more than doubling since 2011/12, from 5,088 to 10,884.

Another cause of delayed discharges – people waiting for a place to become available in a nursing home – has risen by more than 50 percent since 2011/12.

When Chancellor George Osborne made councils the target of austerity in 2010, critics warned it would create a social care crisis that would rebound on the NHS. Because councils fund adult care services, stripping them of money would reduce the number of people they could cater for, meaning that people would be left languishing in the NHS instead, pressurising those frontline health services. These warnings went unheeded.

Since then the government has begun to respond. Councils and local NHS commissioners are now given extra funding if they meet targets to reduce delayed discharges, but the new figures show this is not having an effect.

The government also allowed local authorities to raise council tax specifically to fund adult care services from April this year. However, as Sentinel News revealed last month, this still leaves a £1bn black hole in adult care services caused by rising demand and government funding cuts in 2016/17 alone.

3 thoughts on “Care crisis hits the NHS as delayed discharges reach record high of 1.8 MILLION days

  1. Naturally the warnings went unheeded – this is just what the Tories *want* to do: put so much pressure on the NHS that it collapses and they can subsequently make all sorts of pejorative claims about it despite it being their fault.

    As for elderly… I was 26 in 2012, when I was left stuck in hospital for a week longer than I should have been because my local council dragged their feet over arranging my extra care at home – this in spite of the fact that I did already have a care package at home and simply needed it to be augmented a bit. It took a peer advocate going to them to get me out of hospital as speedily post-surgery as a week.

    Young disabled people are suffering at least as much from this crisis, and we are being thoroughly ignored by the vast majority of the media as they talk about social care cuts affecting elderly people, completely blanking the idea they might affect anyone else, and going on so much about most disabled people being “on the sick” and “faking it” that the disability hate crime rate has skyrocketed since 2010. Not to mention the continual, decades-established & drastically unequal and unfair age discrimination present in the housing sector, particularly in social housing, where wheelchair-accessible housing is almost invariably limited to people aged 50 or older, no matter whether they’re actually disabled or not. A close friend aged 35 recently got to move out of mental health supported housing at last – in a scheme that’s supposed to be limited to tenancies of just 2 years – after 5 years of struggling to find an accessible and affordable flat in the social housing sector and being on every local council and housing association waiting list, even at the top of it… just not old enough.

    There’s no point whatsoever in trying to find accessible housing in the private sector. I’ve yet to hear of any, in nearly a decade of living in Manchester, that’s both truly accessible and affordable to anyone on less than £50K a year. And how many disabled people do you know with that kind of an income who aren’t MPs, paralympians or people with inherited wealth?

    Not to mention the fact that the majority of landlords with accessible or potentially accessible properties won’t take *any* tenant who’s in receipt of benefit, no matter whether it’s DLA/PIP or JSA – they don’t differentiate, they treat us all like unreliable scum no matter what. And developers and architects simply are not building new builds that are accessible – even though that ought to be a legal requirement, given the number of homeowners who would be able to keep their original homes without being forced to move for accessibility reasons later in life if that were the case, and the outright painful discrimination caused by building places inaccessible by default, as though disabled people could never possibly have able-bodied friends or vice versa (and seriously, do not. get me. started on this one. It makes me absolutely enraged the number of friends I am no longer able to visit since I’ve had to start using a chair).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s